Fantasy rankings built for your exact league.

Most sites hand everyone the same list. SignalTuned reads what NFL players actually did and recomputes every value for your scoring, your roster, and your format. Then it shows you where the rest of your league is over or underrating a player, so you know who to buy low and who to sell high.

Connect your league See how the engine works

∑

Math, not consensus

No expert panel to average. The engine reads what players actually did on the field and runs the numbers. The ranking is a calculation, not a committee.

⚙

Tuned to your league

PPR value, TE premium, SuperFlex, custom bonuses. Every score and tier recomputed for your exact rules, not an average league.

◎

Negative results, in public

Every hypothesis the engine tests gets written up on The Lab, including the ones that fail. The receipts are public.

FREE · CONNECT YOUR LEAGUE · EXPLORE EVERYTHING

See the whole engine free. Unlock it on draft night.

Connect your league and explore the entire app. Your full ranked board, recommendations, trade tools, and a live Draft War Room that calls your pick on the clock, flags value as players fall, and tracks your roster needs. It's all there to look at. Pure Signal unlocks the numbers behind them, your Signal Score, LTV, the full Signal Gap, when you want the edge.

Connect your league →

FREE · NO LOGIN · PLAY INSTANTLY

Play VibeRank

Rank today's players best to worst, build your streak, and shape the crowd board. The crowd sets the price. The engine computes the value. PureSignal's Signal Gap shows you every spot they split, so you can trade the difference.

Play VibeRank →

Latest from the Lab

All posts →

2026-06-12

"Volume is rented" is half-cooked. The elite workhorse owns his.

The group chat says draft the bell-cow because volume is king. Our own three-year receipts say the rented-volume tax is real in exactly one RB tier, the muddy middle, and reverses at the top. So we tested whether to fade workhorses. The data said no.

2026-06-10

I over-pay for young receivers. Not the ones who actually catch passes.

My own error report flagged the engine for over-rating receivers age 23 and under, so I went hunting for the bust. Ten years of pairs say the opposite: hold target share fixed and the young receivers who earn a real role actually edge their older peers by four-tenths of a point a week. The over-rating is real. It just lives in the kids who never see the targets, not the ones who do.

2026-06-08

My board over-rates receiving tight ends. Touchdown regression isn't the reason.

My own error report flagged the engine for over-rating pass-catching tight ends, and the takesmiths' favorite tell, touchdown regression, looked like the smoking gun. Ten years of pairs say the TD spike does regress hard off its own line. But hold target share fixed and those tight ends land right back with their peers, 0.37 points a week apart. Real regression, no consequence. The over-rating is real, it's just hiding somewhere else.